When clicking on Poster 1, 3 pages of evidence open:
- the cover of an ‘approved judgement‘
- the discussion of the arguments where RW “ought to have disclosed”
- a newspaper clipping aboug “Fraud concealing information”.
I.e. the judge should not have permitted the non-disclosure of critical evidence.
When clicking on Poster 2, 8 pages of evidence become available:
- approved judgment
- p. 12: it is well established that refusal to pay a debt, even if one has the money to do it, can justify a bankruptcy order
- Section 267 of the Insolvency Act 1986
- Section 269 of the Insolvency Act 1986
- Section 272 of the Insolvency Act 1986
- Decision on the hearing
- Creditor’s Bankruptcy Petition
- Form 6.9
When clicking on Poster 3, 4 pages of evidence become available:
- Judgment Ebert v Midland Bank
- There WAS proof of debt
- Laywers’ Duties
- Evidence in proceedings other than at trial
When clicking on Poster 4, 9 pages of evidence become available:
- Order: Ebert v Trustee in Bankruptcy
- No more actions allowed
- No more legal proceedings
- Order: Ebert v Trustee in Bankruptcy
- No judgment has been entered
- No record of judgment
- From Neuberger to Bankruptcy Trustee
- Letter page 2
- Ruling by Mr Justice Patten
When clicking on Poster 11, 34 pages of evidence open:
- Insolvency case details
- Insolvency case details p.2
- Letter by Insolvency Service
- 22 July 1997 Adjudged Bankrupt
- Endorsement on Order
- 22 July 1997 Order
- Bankruptcy Petition 11216/96
- Total debt allegedly owed
- Bankruptcy Petition 238 SD 96
- Case no 1994 M 1568
- Names of the parties in case 1995 M 1568
When clicking on Poster 12, 16 pages of evidence become accessible.
When clicking on Poster 13, 2 pages of evidence can be viewed.


















Pingback: WANTED: Everybody who contributed to a fraudulent bankruptcy of a SOLVENT property company owner | Mr Gedaljahu Ebert – Bankrupted Fraudulently without Jurisdiction